Friday, August 24, 2007

Banning Canvas


First they came for the communists, and I did not speak out--
because I was not a communist;
Then they came for the socialists, and I did not speak out--
because I was not a socialist;
Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out--
because I was not a trade unionist;
Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out--
because I was not a Jew;
Then they came for me--
and there was no one left to speak out for me.

Pastor Martin Niemöller

Reading the forums and art show applications lately, I’m reminded of the above poem. Certainly nothing as monumental as the history that this poem details, but definitely something worth thinking about.

Digital photography and computers have changed the face of art fairs and photography in general, some say not for the better. Some painters are especially disturbed about our new ability to print on canvas. A vocal few, rather than use the increased competition as motivation to find ways to differentiate themselves, are saying photographers should be banned or restricted in art shows.

Some shows are listening to them. Recently a show that last year accepted many photographers has decided to accept only three this year, all of them traditional, black and white, darkroom photographers. This was after they gladly accepted our jury fees. I will be the first to say, that black and white photography, when done well, is incredible. I wouldn’t be driving five hours next weekend just to meet Clyde Butcher if I didn’t think so. But I believe color has its place too.

But back to the poem. If photographers are successfully kept out of the art fairs, who will be next? Perhaps the jewelers? There are a lot of jewelers at art shows. Get rid of them and there will be a lot more spaces for painters. Or will it be the potters? There’s always been that nagging question, if it is functional, is it art?

The fact is, we are all artists and craftsmen and each art form has its challenges. We should stick together rather than attack each other.

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

Hi Alison,
Nice Blog!
Seeing your bear and Alaska photography on your site brings another
question to my mind concerning painters vs photographers, and that
is...How many Fine Art paintings are actualy inspired by PHOTOGRAPHS
the artist has seen. I remember one time seeing a one man fine art
show at a local mall where this man had painted beautiful underwater
scenes of Humpback Whales. The scenes did look familiar however as
National Geographic had recently published an article on Humpbacks
that I had used as a research source for a college paper.
When I got home I checked the magazine and sure enough, the paintings
were almost exact copies of the article's photos. The positioning of
the Mother to the Calf, the stream of bubbles from the whale's
blowholes, everything. When I was a kid I used to go with my mother
to her Art Classes and every painter there had their easel with the
canvas mounted on it and a photograph clipped to the easel. They may
not have copied it exactly but it certainly allowed them to see how
light plays upon their subjects of choice.
The point I'm trying to make is that to produce an image of a
Grizzly, You had to go to Alaska, (not cheap) brave the elements, be
careful not to make any dumb mistakes like accidently provoking the
bears and consider all of the elements that make a good photograph
such as depth of field, lighting, composition, etc, and take your
best shot.
An oil or watercolor artist can now visit your website, be inspired
by either a bear or alaska scenic photograph, paint a rendition of
it, and have a greater chance of being accepted into Vero Beach.

I'm not trying to condemn painters or state that they are just
copying photographs. I know many paint just from images in their mind
and they are highly skilled artisans. Just don't tell me I'm
undeserving of the title "Artist" due to my medium of choice. I just
feel that we need to accept that we each have our own unique skills
and dedication to our resective mediums.

In my opinion Art Shows should
1. Consider photographers and other mediums as equal (ie equal space
in shows for each)
2. Jury images based on quality of image not on medium.
3. Allow Photographers to sell giclees in limited editions with COAs.
4. Allow painters to sell giclees of their artwork in limited
editions with COAs as long as the original is on display on the wall
of the booth. They can sell the original for a much higher price and
yet still compete for buyers.

Just a thought.
Dean